Ranking universities can serve several purposes:
However, it's important to recognize that university rankings have limitations and should be interpreted with caution. They often rely on subjective criteria, such as surveys, and may not fully capture the diverse missions and strengths of different institutions. Additionally, rankings can sometimes incentivize behaviors that prioritize metrics used in the ranking systems over other important aspects of education and research.
The primary purpose of ranking world universities is to provide stakeholders, including students, academics, policymakers, and employers, with a comparative assessment of the quality and performance of higher education institutions globally. Here are some specific purposes:
Overall, while university rankings have limitations and should be interpreted with caution, they play a significant role in shaping perceptions, decisions, and strategies within the global higher education landscape.
Several common university ranking systems are widely recognized and used globally. Some of the most prominent ones include:
These ranking systems employ various methodologies and criteria to assess universities, leading to differences in rankings across different systems. It's essential for users to understand the methodologies and indicators used by each ranking system and consider their relevance to their specific needs and interests.
هدف از رتبهبندی دانشگاههای جهان، بررسی کیفیت آموزشی، تحقیقاتی و علمی آنها است. رتبه بندی معیاری برای مقایسه دانشگاههای مختلف دنیا با یکدیگر نیز به شمار میرود. سایر مزایای رتبهبندی دانشگاههای دنیا را با هم ببینیم:
براساس گزارش انجمن دانشگاههای اروپایی (EUA) روشهای متفاوتی برای دسته بندی رتبه بندیها وجود دارد. براساس هدف مؤسسات رتبه بندی این نظامها به صورت زیر تقسیم بندی میشوند:
نظام رتبه بندی شانگهای – ARWU
نظام رتبه بندی تایمز – THE
نظام رتبه بندی کیو اس – QS
نظام رتبه بندی بهترین دانشگاهها در US News
نظام رتبه بندی Reitor
نظام رتبه بندی لایدن – Leiden
نظام رتبه بندی عملکرد براساس مقالات علمی در تایوان – NTU
نظام رتبه بندی کیفیت سنجی پژوهش دانشگاهی توسط کمیسیون اروپایی
نظام رتبه بندی دانشگاهی CHE
نظام رتبه بندی چند جانبه اروپایی – U-Multirank
رتبه بندی وبومتریکس – Webometrics
کیفیت سنجی یادگیری در آموزش عالی – OECD
رتبه بندی دانشگاههای جهان اسلام - ISC:
لازم به اشاره است که همه دانشگاهها و موسسات آموزشی و پژوهشی در همه این سیستمهای رتبه بندی وارد نشده اندو لذا جامعه آماری مختلفی دارند هم چنین از انجاییکه هدف گیری نظامهای رتبه بندی با هم متفاوت است مثلا برخی توجه ویژه به پژوهش و برخی توجه به تعداد رشتهها و آمارها دارند که در این خصوص دانشگاههای جامع که تعداد دانشجو و بالتبع ان تعداد مقالات یا رشتههای بیشتری دارند نسبت به دانشگاههای فنی امتیاز بیشتری کسب میکنند هم چنین در برخی سیستمها با توجه به رشتههای مورد بررسی توجه بیشتری به برخی رشتهها مانند رشتههای علوم طبیعی، و پزشکی و توجه کمتری به رشتههای علوم انسانی یا هنر دارد. در برخی نظامهای رتبه بندی تالیف کتاب اهمیت داشته در حالی که در برخی سیستمها وزن چندانی ندارد. زبان انتشار مقالات هم در نظامهای رتبه بندی موثر است. نظامهای مختلف رتبه بندی وزنهای مختلفی مثلا تا ۴۰ درصد به نظرسنجی از کارفرمایان و همکاران علمی دانشگاهها اختصاص میدهند که در نتایج ارزیابی بسیار اثر گذار است. بر اساس تفاوتهای مود در نظامهای رتبه بندی و این واقعیت که هریک از این سیستمها بخشی از توانمندیهای دانشگاه را بهتر توصیف میکند دانشگاه صنعتی شریف در چهار نظام رتبه بندی ۱)شانگهای ۲) تایمز ۳)کیو اس ۴) جهان اسلام به ارزیابی خود پرداخته است.
Comparing common university rating systems can be insightful for understanding their methodologies, strengths, and limitations. Here's a comparison of some widely recognized rating systems:
Times Higher Education World University Rankings (THE):
Methodology: THE rankings assess universities based on teaching, research, citations, industry income, and international outlook. It also conducts reputation surveys among academics and employers.
Strengths: Comprehensive approach, including multiple indicators and international perspectives.
Limitations: Reliance on subjective reputation surveys, which can be influenced by biases.
QS World University Rankings (QS):
Methodology: QS rankings evaluate universities based on academic reputation, employer reputation, faculty/student ratio, citations per faculty, international faculty ratio, and international student ratio.
Strengths: Emphasis on academic and employer reputation, along with other objective indicators.
Limitations: Limited data sources and indicators compared to other rankings.
Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) - Shanghai Ranking:
Methodology: ARWU rankings primarily focus on research performance, including measures such as Nobel Prizes and Fields Medals won by alumni and faculty, highly cited researchers, and publications in top journals.
Strengths: Strong emphasis on research output and quality.
Limitations: Limited focus on teaching quality, student experience, and other aspects of university performance.
Webometrics Ranking of World Universities (Webometrics):
Methodology: Webometrics rankings assess universities based on their web presence and impact, including factors such as web traffic, online visibility, and openness of academic content.
Strengths: Unique perspective on universities' digital presence and impact.
Limitations: May not fully capture academic quality or reputation, as it focuses primarily on web-based indicators.
U-Multirank:
Methodology: U-Multirank provides multidimensional rankings based on various indicators, including teaching and learning, research, knowledge transfer, international orientation, and regional engagement.
Strengths: Offers a customizable approach and allows users to compare universities based on specific criteria.
Limitations: Relatively limited recognition and influence compared to other ranking systems.
Each ranking system has its own methodology, strengths, and limitations. Users should consider their specific needs and priorities when using rankings to assess universities, as no single ranking can capture all aspects of university performance. Additionally, it's essential to interpret rankings with caution and consider multiple sources of information when evaluating universities.
Both U-Multirank and 4icu.org offer university rankings, but they have different methodologies and focus areas.
U-Multirank:
4icu.org:
While both U-Multirank and 4icu.org offer university rankings, they serve different purposes and use different methodologies. U-Multirank provides a multidimensional assessment of universities based on various criteria, while 4icu.org focuses more narrowly on web popularity and online presence. Users should consider their specific needs and preferences when consulting these ranking systems.
The Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU), also known as the Shanghai Ranking, is one of the most influential and widely cited university ranking systems globally. Here's an overview of the Shanghai Ranking system:
Methodology:
Ranking Categories:
ARWU ranks the top 1,000 universities globally, with additional rankings for specific academic disciplines. The rankings are typically released annually and are based on data from several sources, including bibliometric databases such as Web of Science and academic awards databases.
Impact and Criticisms:
The Shanghai Ranking has significant influence and is widely referenced by universities, policymakers, and stakeholders in higher education. However, it has also faced criticism for its heavy emphasis on research output and citations, which may not fully capture the quality of education or other aspects of university performance. Additionally, the focus on prestigious awards and high-impact publications may favor older and more established institutions.
Overall, while the Shanghai Ranking provides valuable insights into the research performance of universities worldwide, users should consider its limitations and supplement their analysis with additional information and perspectives.
The Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings is a highly regarded global ranking system that evaluates universities based on several key performance indicators. Here's an overview of the THE ranking system:
Methodology:
Ranking Categories:
THE ranks universities globally and also provides rankings by region, subject area, and specific university missions (such as young universities or universities focused on innovation). The rankings are typically updated annually and are based on data collected from various sources, including surveys of academics, employers, and bibliometric databases.
Impact and Criticisms:
The Times Higher Education World University Rankings are widely respected and influential, serving as a valuable resource for prospective students, academics, policymakers, and university administrators. However, like any ranking system, THE rankings have faced criticism, including concerns about the weighting of certain indicators, the representativeness of survey samples, and the potential for manipulation or gaming of ranking criteria by universities.
Overall, the THE rankings provide valuable insights into the performance and reputation of universities worldwide, but users should consider the methodology and limitations of the ranking system when interpreting the results.
The QS World University Rankings, produced by QS Quacquarelli Symonds, is a prominent global university ranking system that evaluates universities based on several key performance indicators. Here's an overview of the QS ranking system:
Methodology:
Ranking Categories:
QS ranks universities globally and also provides rankings by region, subject area, and specific indicators (such as academic reputation or employer reputation). The rankings are updated annually and are based on data collected from various sources, including surveys of academics and employers, and bibliometric databases.
Impact and Criticisms:
The QS World University Rankings are widely recognized and influential, serving as a valuable resource for students, academics, employers, and policymakers in assessing the performance and reputation of universities globally. However, the rankings have faced criticism regarding the methodology, including concerns about the representativeness of survey samples, the weighting of indicators, and the transparency of data sources.
Overall, while the QS rankings provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of universities worldwide, users should consider the methodology and limitations of the ranking system when interpreting the results.
The U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Rankings is a widely recognized and influential ranking system that evaluates universities and colleges in the United States. Here's an overview of the U.S. News ranking system:
Methodology:
Ranking Categories:
U.S. News ranks universities and colleges in various categories, including National Universities, National Liberal Arts Colleges, Regional Universities, and Regional Colleges. Additionally, the rankings include specific lists for Best Undergraduate Engineering Programs, Best Undergraduate Business Programs, and other specialized categories.
Impact and Criticisms:
The U.S. News Best Colleges Rankings are highly influential and widely referenced by prospective students, parents, university administrators, and policymakers. However, the rankings have faced criticism for various reasons, including concerns about the methodology, such as the reliance on subjective reputation surveys and the limited scope of factors considered.
Despite criticisms, the U.S. News rankings remain a valuable tool for comparing universities and colleges in the United States, providing insights into academic quality, student outcomes, and institutional resources. Users should consider the methodology and limitations of the rankings when interpreting the results and making decisions.
As of my last update in January 2022, I don't have specific information on a ranking system called the "Reitor" rating system for ranking universities. It's possible that this system has been developed or introduced after that time, or it might be a local or regional ranking system that is not widely known.
If the "Reitor" rating system is a new development, I recommend checking for updates from reliable sources within the relevant educational or academic community. You may find information from official announcements, academic publications, or reputable news sources.
If you have specific details or context about the "Reitor" rating system, feel free to share them, and I can try to provide more insights based on that information.
The Leiden Ranking, also known as the CWTS Leiden Ranking, is a university ranking system developed by the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) at Leiden University in the Netherlands. Unlike some other university rankings, the Leiden Ranking focuses primarily on the scientific performance and impact of universities worldwide. Here's an overview of the Leiden Ranking system:
Methodology:
Ranking Categories:
The Leiden Ranking provides rankings for individual universities worldwide based on their scientific performance and impact. It ranks universities across various indicators, including overall scientific impact, field-specific impact, collaboration, and open access publishing.
Impact and Criticisms:
The Leiden Ranking is widely regarded as a valuable tool for assessing the research performance and impact of universities globally, particularly in the academic community. Its emphasis on bibliometric indicators and normalization techniques makes it a useful complement to other university rankings that focus on different aspects of institutional performance.
However, like any ranking system, the Leiden Ranking has limitations and may not capture all dimensions of university quality and performance. Users should consider the specific objectives and priorities of their evaluation when interpreting the ranking results.
Overall, the Leiden Ranking provides valuable insights into the scientific contributions and impact of universities worldwide, particularly in the context of research and scholarly activities.
The Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for World Universities, commonly referred to as the NTU Ranking, is developed by the National Taiwan University (NTU). This ranking system evaluates the scientific research performance of universities worldwide based on bibliometric indicators. Here's an overview of the NTU Ranking system:
Methodology:
Ranking Categories:
The NTU Ranking ranks universities globally based on their scientific research performance. It provides overall rankings as well as rankings by subject fields or academic disciplines. The rankings are updated annually and are based on the latest available bibliometric data.
Impact and Criticisms:
The NTU Ranking is widely recognized and respected within the academic community for its focus on scientific research performance and impact. Its reliance on bibliometric indicators provides objective measures of research output and impact, making it a valuable tool for evaluating the research strengths of universities worldwide.
However, like any ranking system, the NTU Ranking has limitations. It may not fully capture the diversity of research activities or the broader mission of universities beyond scientific research. Additionally, users should be aware of the inherent biases and limitations of bibliometric data when interpreting the ranking results.
Overall, the NTU Ranking serves as a valuable resource for assessing the scientific contributions of universities globally, particularly in the context of research and scholarly activities.
As of my last update in January 2022, there isn't a specific academic research quality rating system established by the European Commission. However, the European Commission is actively involved in promoting research and innovation through various programs and initiatives, such as Horizon Europe, the European Research Council (ERC), and the European Framework Program for Research and Innovation.
These programs aim to support high-quality research across Europe and beyond, foster collaboration between researchers and institutions, and address societal challenges through scientific inquiry. While the European Commission does not directly administer a rating system for academic research quality, it provides funding and support for research projects and initiatives that demonstrate excellence and contribute to advancing knowledge and innovation.
Additionally, the European Commission supports initiatives to enhance research assessment and evaluation practices, promote open science, and ensure research integrity. These efforts aim to improve the quality, transparency, and effectiveness of research evaluation processes within Europe and globally.
While there may not be a specific rating system established by the European Commission, there are various academic and research organizations, both within Europe and internationally, that develop and implement evaluation frameworks and methodologies to assess research quality and impact. These frameworks often consider factors such as publications, citations, collaborations, and societal relevance when evaluating research outputs and outcomes.
The Center for Higher Education (CHE) in Germany publishes the CHE University Ranking, which is one of the most well-known and comprehensive ranking systems for higher education institutions in Germany. Here's an overview of the CHE ranking system:
Methodology:
Ranking Categories:
The CHE University Ranking covers various categories, including overall university rankings, rankings by subject areas, and rankings of specific university departments or programs. The rankings are updated periodically, with new data collected and analyzed to provide up-to-date information for prospective students and researchers.
Impact and Criticisms:
The CHE University Ranking is highly regarded within Germany and is widely used by students, parents, university administrators, and policymakers to evaluate and compare higher education institutions. Its focus on student satisfaction and engagement, along with objective data on academic performance, provides a comprehensive view of university quality.
However, like any ranking system, the CHE ranking has faced criticisms, including concerns about the reliability of student surveys as a measure of educational quality and the potential for bias in the selection of indicators. Additionally, some critics argue that rankings may oversimplify the complexities of higher education and encourage competition at the expense of collaboration.
Overall, the CHE University Ranking serves as a valuable tool for prospective students and researchers in Germany, providing insights into the strengths and weaknesses of universities and helping inform decision-making in higher education.
U-Multirank is indeed a multidimensional ranking system for higher education institutions developed by the European Commission. It aims to provide a comprehensive and user-centric approach to ranking universities and colleges across the globe. Here's an overview of U-Multirank:
Methodology:
Ranking Categories:
U-Multirank provides rankings for individual universities and colleges worldwide. It covers various categories and dimensions, allowing users to compare institutions based on teaching quality, research performance, internationalization efforts, and other criteria.
Impact and Criticisms:
U-Multirank has gained recognition for its multidimensional approach to university rankings and its emphasis on user customization and transparency. It offers a more nuanced and comprehensive assessment of institutional performance compared to traditional rankings that rely solely on reputation or research output.
However, U-Multirank has also faced criticisms, including concerns about the complexity of its methodology and the potential for data limitations or inaccuracies. Some stakeholders argue that the multidimensional approach may make it challenging to interpret and compare rankings effectively.
Overall, U-Multirank provides a valuable tool for students, researchers, policymakers, and other stakeholders interested in assessing and comparing higher education institutions worldwide. Its multidimensional approach offers a more holistic view of institutional performance, helping users make informed decisions based on their specific needs and priorities.
Webometrics Ranking of World Universities, also known as Webometrics, is a ranking system developed by the Cybermetrics Lab, a research group belonging to the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), the largest public research body in Spain. Here's an overview of the Webometrics ranking system:
Methodology:
Ranking Categories:
Webometrics provides rankings for universities worldwide based on their web presence and impact. It ranks universities overall and also provides rankings by country, region, and academic discipline. The rankings are updated regularly, typically every six months, to reflect changes in universities' web presence and impact over time.
Impact and Criticisms:
Webometrics has gained attention for its innovative approach to university rankings, focusing on web-based indicators rather than traditional measures of academic quality or research performance. It provides valuable insights into universities' online visibility and engagement, reflecting their efforts to disseminate knowledge and engage with broader audiences.
However, Webometrics has also faced criticisms, including concerns about the reliability and validity of web-based indicators as measures of academic quality or reputation. Some stakeholders argue that web presence and impact may not fully capture the diversity and complexity of universities' contributions to research, teaching, and society.
Overall, Webometrics offers a unique perspective on university rankings, complementing traditional approaches with web-based indicators of online visibility and impact. While it may not provide a comprehensive assessment of academic quality, it serves as a valuable tool for understanding universities' digital presence and engagement in the digital age.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) conducts research and provides insights into various aspects of education, including the quality of learning in higher education. While the OECD doesn't have a specific ranking system for universities, it does engage in assessments and research on education quality using various methodologies. Here's an overview of how the OECD approaches the measurement of learning quality in higher education:
Overall, the OECD's approach to measuring learning quality in higher education is multifaceted and data-driven, focusing on assessments, quality assurance, comparative analysis, policy recommendations, and data collection. Through its efforts, the OECD aims to support the improvement of higher education systems and ensure that students receive high-quality learning experiences that prepare them for success in the workforce and society.
As of my last update in January 2022, there isn't a universally recognized "Islamic ranking" of universities. However, there are initiatives and organizations within the Islamic world that focus on evaluating and ranking universities based on specific criteria that align with Islamic values, principles, and educational objectives.
One such initiative is the "Islamic World Science Citation Center (ISC)" based in Iran. It has developed the Islamic World University Ranking (IWUR) as part of its efforts to promote scientific research and collaboration within the Islamic world. The IWUR considers factors such as research output, citation impact, international collaboration, and other indicators relevant to academic excellence and Islamic values.
Another example is the "OIC Universities League" organized by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), which includes rankings and assessments of universities from member countries based on various criteria, including academic reputation, research output, and innovation.
It's worth noting that these rankings may have a specific focus on universities within the Islamic world or those that adhere to Islamic principles, but they are not the only rankings available. Many universities in predominantly Muslim countries are also ranked by global ranking systems such as QS World University Rankings, Times Higher Education World University Rankings, and others, which use more general criteria to assess universities worldwide.
As with any ranking system, users should consider the methodology, criteria, and objectives of Islamic ranking systems when interpreting the results and making decisions. Additionally, rankings should be used as one of many factors in evaluating universities, alongside considerations such as academic programs, faculty expertise, facilities, and student support services.
The Islamic World Science Citation Center (ISC) is an organization based in Iran that aims to promote scientific research and collaboration within the Islamic world. As part of its efforts, ISC has developed the Islamic World University Ranking (IWUR), which evaluates universities based on various criteria relevant to academic excellence and Islamic values. Here's an overview of the ISC's ranking system:
Methodology:
Ranking Categories:
ISC's Islamic World University Ranking (IWUR) provides rankings for universities in the Islamic world based on the criteria mentioned above. It covers universities from countries with significant Muslim populations, including those in the Middle East, North Africa, South Asia, and Southeast Asia.
Impact and Criticisms:
ISC's ranking system serves as a valuable tool for assessing the research performance and impact of universities within the Islamic world. By focusing on criteria relevant to academic excellence and Islamic values, the ranking aims to promote collaboration and excellence in research and education among universities in Muslim-majority countries.
However, like any ranking system, ISC's ranking may have limitations and criticisms. These may include concerns about the methodology, data quality, transparency, and the weighting of different criteria. Users should consider these factors when interpreting the results and making decisions based on the rankings.
Overall, ISC's Islamic World University Ranking contributes to the visibility and recognition of universities within the Islamic world and provides valuable insights for stakeholders interested in higher education in Muslim-majority countries.
It seems you're interested in international organizations related to universities or higher education. While there isn't a specific entity known as the "International Union for University," there are several international associations and unions that focus on higher education, university leadership, and collaboration among universities worldwide. Here are a few prominent ones:
These are just a few examples of international associations and unions that focus on higher education. Each organization has its own mission, objectives, and activities aimed at advancing the cause of higher education globally.
It seems you've listed several international organizations related to universities and higher education. Here's a brief overview of each:
Each of these organizations plays a unique role in advancing higher education and fostering collaboration among universities worldwide.
As of my last update in January 2022, there isn't a widely recognized organization called the "International Union for University" (IUU). It's possible that you may be referring to a specific organization with a similar name or an organization that operates under a different name.
However, there are several international organizations and associations that focus on higher education, university leadership, and collaboration among universities worldwide. These organizations may bring together university leaders, policymakers, researchers, and other stakeholders to address common challenges, promote cooperation, and advocate for the role of higher education in society.
One example is the International Association of University Presidents (IAUP), which I mentioned in the previous response. The IAUP is a global association of university presidents and rectors that aims to promote cooperation and collaboration among universities and advance the cause of higher education worldwide.
If you have more specific information about the "International Union for University" or if you're referring to a different organization, please provide additional details, and I'll do my best to assist you further.
As of my last update in January 2022, there isn't a specific "International Union of University Presidents" (IUUP) that is widely recognized or established. However, there are organizations and associations that bring together university leaders from around the world to exchange ideas, collaborate on common challenges, and advocate for higher education. One such organization is the International Association of University Presidents (IAUP).
International Association of University Presidents (IAUP): The IAUP is a global association of university presidents and rectors from institutions of higher education around the world. Founded in 1964, IAUP aims to promote cooperation and collaboration among universities and advance the cause of higher education worldwide. It provides a platform for university leaders to discuss common issues, share best practices, and advocate for the role of universities in addressing global challenges.
Activities of IAUP:
While the specific activities and impact of the International Association of University Presidents may vary, it serves as an important platform for university leaders to engage with their counterparts from around the world and work together to advance the cause of higher education.
The Association of Universities of Asia and the Pacific (AUAP) is a regional organization that promotes cooperation and collaboration among universities and institutions of higher education in Asia and the Pacific region. Here's an overview of AUAP:
Mission and Objectives: AUAP aims to foster understanding, partnership, and solidarity among universities and higher education institutions in the Asia-Pacific region. Its objectives include:
Activities and Programs: AUAP organizes various activities and programs to achieve its objectives, including:
Membership: AUAP membership is open to universities, higher education institutions, and organizations in Asia and the Pacific region. Member institutions benefit from networking opportunities, access to AUAP's programs and resources, and participation in regional initiatives to promote higher education excellence and cooperation.
Overall, the Association of Universities of Asia and the Pacific plays a significant role in fostering cooperation and collaboration among universities in the region, contributing to the advancement of higher education and research in Asia and the Pacific.
The International Council of Virtual Universities (ICVU) is a global network of universities and institutions that are engaged in online and distance education. It serves as a platform for collaboration, sharing best practices, and promoting the quality and effectiveness of virtual higher education. Here's an overview of the ICVU:
Mission and Objectives: The ICVU's mission is to advance the field of virtual higher education by fostering collaboration among institutions, promoting innovation and quality assurance, and advocating for the recognition and value of online learning. Its objectives include:
Activities and Programs: The ICVU organizes various activities and programs to achieve its objectives, including:
Membership: ICVU's membership is open to universities, colleges, and institutions that offer online education or are interested in advancing the field of virtual higher education. Member institutions benefit from networking opportunities, access to ICVU's programs and resources, and participation in collaborative initiatives.
Overall, the International Council of Virtual Universities plays a vital role in promoting collaboration, innovation, and quality assurance in online education, contributing to the advancement of virtual higher education globally.
The Union of Islamic World Universities (UIWU) is an international organization that aims to foster collaboration and cooperation among universities and higher education institutions across the Islamic world. Here's an overview of UIWU:
Mission and Objectives: UIWU's mission is to strengthen ties and cooperation among universities in the Islamic world to advance higher education, research, and innovation. Its objectives include:
Activities and Programs: UIWU organizes various activities and programs to achieve its objectives, including:
Membership: UIWU's membership is open to universities and higher education institutions in the Islamic world. Member institutions benefit from networking opportunities, access to UIWU's programs and resources, and participation in regional and international initiatives to promote higher education excellence and cooperation.
Overall, the Union of Islamic World Universities plays a significant role in fostering collaboration and solidarity among universities in the Islamic world, contributing to the advancement of higher education, research, and innovation in the region.
As of my last update in January 2022, there isn't an organization widely recognized by the name "International Union of Universities" (IUU). However, there are several international organizations related to higher education that may have similar objectives or names. One such organization is the International Association of Universities (IAU), which is a global association of higher education institutions and organizations.
International Association of Universities (IAU): The IAU is a membership-based organization that serves as a global voice for higher education. It brings together universities, higher education associations, and other stakeholders to promote international cooperation, enhance the quality and relevance of higher education, and advocate for the value of higher education in addressing global challenges.
Mission and Objectives: The IAU's mission is to advance higher education worldwide and contribute to the development of a peaceful, equitable, and sustainable society. Its objectives include:
Activities and Programs: The IAU organizes various activities and programs to achieve its objectives, including:
Membership: The IAU's membership includes universities, higher education associations, and other organizations from around the world. Member institutions benefit from networking opportunities, access to IAU's programs and resources, and participation in initiatives to advance higher education globally.
Overall, while there isn't an organization specifically known as the International Union of Universities, the International Association of Universities (IAU) serves as a prominent global association that represents the interests of higher education institutions worldwide.
The Association of Universities of Asia and the Pacific (AUAP) is a regional organization that fosters collaboration and cooperation among universities and higher education institutions in the Asia-Pacific region. Here's an overview of AUAP:
Mission and Objectives: AUAP's mission is to promote understanding, partnership, and solidarity among universities in the Asia-Pacific region and contribute to the advancement of higher education, research, and innovation. Its objectives include:
Activities and Programs: AUAP organizes various activities and programs to achieve its objectives, including:
Membership: AUAP's membership is open to universities and higher education institutions in the Asia-Pacific region. Member institutions benefit from networking opportunities, access to AUAP's programs and resources, and participation in regional initiatives to promote higher education excellence and cooperation.
Overall, the Association of Universities of Asia and the Pacific plays a significant role in fostering collaboration and partnership among universities in the region, contributing to the advancement of higher education, research, and innovation in Asia and the Pacific.
The Islamic World Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (ICESCO) is a specialized organization of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). Here's an overview:
Mission and Objectives: ICESCO's mission is to promote education, science, culture, and communication among member states and Muslim communities worldwide. Its objectives include:
Activities and Programs: ICESCO implements various programs and initiatives to achieve its objectives, including:
Membership: ICESCO's membership includes 54 member states, representing a diverse range of countries with significant Muslim populations. It also collaborates with international organizations, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and other stakeholders to achieve its goals.
Impact and Influence: ICESCO plays a significant role in promoting education, science, culture, and communication among member states and Muslim communities worldwide. It provides a platform for cooperation and collaboration in key areas of development and contributes to the advancement of Islamic values, heritage, and civilization.
Overall, the Islamic World Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (ICESCO) serves as an important platform for cooperation and solidarity among member states and Muslim communities, promoting education, science, culture, and communication in the Islamic world and beyond.
| Criterion | Indicator | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Education | Percentage of graduate students | 5% |
| Percentage of non-local students | 5% | |
| Ratio of academic staff to students | 5% | |
| Doctoral degrees awarded | 10% | |
| Alumni as Nobel Laureates & Fields Medalists | 10% | |
| Research | Annual research income | 5% |
| Nature & Science Papers | 10% | |
| SCIE & SSCI papers | 10% | |
| International patents | 10% | |
| Faculty | Percentage of academic staff with a doctoral degree | 5% |
| Staff as Nobel Laureates and Fields Medalists | 10% | |
| Highly cited researchers | 10% | |
| Resources | Annual budget |
5% |
